New electoral laws challenged in High Court
Two former independents launched a High Court challenge to new electoral laws on Monday, accusing the major parties of rigging campaign finance rules to ensure federal politics remained a “cosy table for two”.
What we know:
-
Former Goldstein MP Zoe Daniel and former senator for South Australia Rex Patrick claim the reforms “unlevel” the playing field for smaller players and are unconstitutional (The Guardian).
-
The changes, which are due to come into effect in mid 2026, cap donations to $50,000 per person for a party or candidate and an $800,000 election spending cap per electorate (Yahoo).
-
But major parties could receive up to $450,000 per person, as a donor can give $50,000 to each of their state, territory and federal branches.
-
Another rule prevents a single donor, such as Climate 200, giving to more than five candidates in a state or territory.
- Daniel said the major parties “could get better, or they could rig the rules. What a surprise that they’ve chosen the latter. It’s a rort, not reform” (The Age).
